Legal Opinion
Connecticut Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Milano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1983No. 11156PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment enforcing a previously negotiated consent decree. The plaintiffs, Connecticut Pharmaceutical Association, Stephen Prigodich, and Milton Smirnoff, on October 11,1979, filed a complaint seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, Anthony Milano, secretary of the office of policy and management of the state of Connecticut, to adopt a new fee schedule for the dispensing of Medicaid prescriptions in accordance with state and federal statutes and regulations. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, alleging that the trial…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Connecticut Water Co. v. BeausoleilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.