Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Stockett

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 1944No. [No. 6, January Term (Adv.), 1945.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

This case arose by the filing of a petition for the writ of mandamus in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, on September 30, 1944. The petitioner, Noah A. Hillman, recites that he is a citizen of the United States, and of the State of Maryland, a resident and tax payer of the City of Annapolis, and a member of the Bar of the State of Maryland. The defendants are the Board of Supervisors of Election for Anne Arundel County. The Secretary of State of Maryland filed an intervening petition and was made a party defendant by order of Court. All of the defendants demurred. The Court below…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pumphrey v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  2. Levering v. Park CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
  3. Worman v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  4. Brawner v. Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. Warfield v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Schneider v. LansdaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Rupe v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Andrews v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API