Legal Opinion
Levering v. Park Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 13, 1919PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
On the 25th of May, 1918, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore passed the following ordinance, known as Ordinance No. 353, and entitled
“An ordinance to repeal and reordain, with amendments Section 3 of Article 31 of the Baltimore City Code, title ‘Sabbath.’
“Section 1. Be it ordained by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, That Section 3 of Article 31 of the Baltimore City Code, title ‘Sabbath,’ be and the same is hereby repealed and reordained so as to read as follows:
“Section 3. (A) Every person who shall fish or hunt or who shall play hall or any other game whatsoever on the Sabbath…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Petit v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Rossberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Pumphrey v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Ulman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Mayor of Hagerstown v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- County Council v. Investors Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Mayor of Baltimore v. SitnickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- County Council v. Montgomery Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.