Legal Opinion
Morgold, Inc. v. Keeler
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 27, 1995No. C-92-4902-CALPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PROVENANCE
LEGGE, District Judge.
This case requires the court to resolve the ownership of a work of art. The word “provenance” has developed in the art world as a term for the subject of title to works of art. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, and was briefed, argued, and submitted for decision.
The court heard the testimony of the witnesses and has reviewed the relevant portions of the transcripts of their testimony. The court has reviewed the exhibits which were admitted into evidence,1 the record of the case, the briefs and arguments of counsel, and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Meese v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Jiri Mucha v. Charles KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- DeWeerth v. BaldingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. CarrollDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- BAKALAR v. VavraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Joseph P. Carroll Ltd. v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Deseret Farms of California, Inc. (In Re Sargent Walnut Ranches, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1998
- Jack Solomon v. Judy Goffman CutlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012