Legal Opinion

Howell v. Iola Portland Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 10, 1912No. 17,429PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The .opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

James Howell recovered a judgment against the Iola Portland Cement Company for the losses he had sustained by reason of injuries received by his minor son while in the employ of the defendant. The company appeals. The recovery was for expenses incurred by the plaintiff for medical attendance, and for the loss of the services of his son during minority. The negligence alleged in the petition was the failure of the defendant to provide a safe place for its workmen, the defects specified being a lack of sufficient light, and an omission to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abeles v. BransfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Maelzer v. SwanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Gibson v. Kansas City Packing Box Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Howell v. Iola Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Braden v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Gruender v. FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API