Legal Opinion

Braden v. Neal

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1931No. 29,727PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by beneficiaries of an oral contract to make a will, to enforce the contract and to remove obstructions to enforcement. Demurrers to the amended petition were sustained, and plaintiffs appeal.

W. J. Kessinger and his wife, Lapatete Kessinger, had no children. On the death of one, the survivor would inherit the property of the decedent. Each one had collateral relatives. Mr. and Mrs. Kessinger agreed orally that during their joint lives neither would make a will, and that the survivor would make a will disposing of whatever…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Stahl v. StevensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Howell v. Iola Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
  2. Woltz v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. Clutter v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Johnson v. SodenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API