Legal Opinion

Maelzer v. Swan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1907No. 14,950PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Nemaha district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action to recover the value of corn sold by tenants of Martha E. Swan to G. J. Maelzer, upon which she had a landlord’s lien. One of the tenants sold Maelzer corn of the value of $343.70, and the other sold him corn of the value of *497$253.57. These sales were made when the rent on the leased premises had not been paid. The court found that when Maelzer purchased and paid for the com he knew it came from rented premises; that the persons selling the corn were tenants on the Swan farms; and that the purchaser had notice that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coulson v. WingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. Scully v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Stadel v. AikinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Neifert v. AmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. HattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Howell v. Iola Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Lawrence National Bank v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API