Legal Opinion

Lee v. Hester

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1982No. 55966, 56053PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The issue here is whether contested matrimonial suits may be routinely and indiscriminately referred to a special judge for resolution of all issues.

The divorce cases which gave rise to the proceeding before us were initially assigned to a special judge. When the assignment came under challenge based on the statutory limitation, in 20 O.S.Supp.1978 § 123 A,1 upon a special judge’s adjudicative authority, they were transferred out. The same special judge was then re-assigned to the cases as “referee”. He was ordered to hear the evidence and report all factual issues to one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Rand v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. North v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Jernigan v. JerniganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API