Legal Opinion

North v. Byrnes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1938No. 25440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This suit was brought by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against W. L. North and A. L. Chase, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover damages from them as sureties on an' appeal bond, which was given to suspend the authority of a receiver pending the determination of an appeal from an order refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver. The bond was filed in the case of Irene Byrnes v. Noble Chase and E. M. Chase, which action was brought for the purpose of subjecting certain properties alleged to have been conveyed by E. M. Chase to Noble Chase in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. Soutter Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Morrow v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Fechteler v. Palm Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Probst v. BearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lee v. Durango MusicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Lee v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Jenkins v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Herron v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Lee v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API