Legal Opinion

Global NAPs, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 23, 2005No. 04-P-247PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

At the center of this action is a clash between telecommunications providers,- both of which are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 251 et seq. (2000). Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 252(b)(1), the plaintiff, Global NAPs, Inc. (Global), brought two arbitration actions against the defendant, Verizon New England (Verizon), which were resolved *601in Verizon’s favor in 2002. Subsequent to those decisions, one of which had already been appealed, Jack Conroy, Verizon’s regulatory affairs chief, gave an interview to a Boston Globe business…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Office One, Inc. v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Kobrin v. GastfriendMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. McLarnon v. JokischMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. North American Expositions Co. v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Cadle Co. v. SchlichtmannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Marabello v. Boston Bark Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Ehrlich v. SternMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API