Legal Opinion

Fabre v. Walton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 12, 2002PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

Amalia Walton sought and obtained an abuse protection order against Sean Fabre. In response, Fabre filed a civil complaint against Walton asserting a single claim of abuse of process arising out of her application for the abuse protection order. Walton filed an unsuccessful special motion to dismiss pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 59H (commonly known as the anti-SLAJPP statute), and appealed the denial of that motion to the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3.

We decide two issues: first, whether there is a right to interlocutory appellate review when a trial judge denies a special motion…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Brum v. Town of DartmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fabre v. WaltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Psy-Ed Corporation v. KLEIN HIRSCHMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Liberty Synergistics Inc. v. Microflo Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API