Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Denham v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1902No. 4281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

— The relator was fined $300 for contempt of court, and ordered committed until such fine was paid, and until an order-of the court in relation to turning over certain moneys to a receiver was complied with. An exception was taken to the judgment for contempt, which was al*591lowed. An appeal was taken from said judgment, and the court was asked to fix the amount of a supersedeas bond for the purpose of staying the judgment of contempt until the matter could be tried on appeal. The court refused to fix said bond, and the relator is here asking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nooksack River Boom Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re CaveWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fawcett v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Olson v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. German-American Safe Deposit & Savings Bank v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mayers v. Bronson, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. PoindexterWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Cooper v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API