State ex rel. Nooksack River Boom Co. v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
Original Application for Prohibition. The facts are fully stated iu the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court were delivered by
Stiles, J.
— On the 3d day of November, 1890, the relator, the Nooksack River Boom Company, and the Bellingham Bay Boom Company, were rival corporations, organized under the act of March 17, 1890, entitled “An act to declare and regulate the powers, rights and duties of corporations organized to build booms and to catch logs and timber products therein.” Laws 1889-90, p. 470. Both companies had their booms and works at the mouth of the Nooksack river, in Whatcom county; but theyNooksack company’s boom was so much higher up, or further within the mouth…
2Cited by37 opinions
- Sage v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- State ex rel. Dudley v. DaggettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Cooper v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Rochford v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1892
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.