State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county. Rice, J., entered January 23, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in contempt proceedings, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This proceeding was instituted by relator, the Nicomen Boom Company, in whom the right of booming logs in the North river in Pacific county, Washington, has been adjudged by this court to be. The parties are not strangers to this court; consequently a rehearsal of the differences arising between them in their efforts to have determined the prior rights of boomage under the state law in North river is not now necessary. Reference to the cases of Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom etc. Co., 40 Wash. 315, 82 Pac., 412; North Shore Boom etc. Co. v. Nicomen Boom Co., 52 Wash. 564, 101 Pac. 48,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Mason v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- United States v. Homestake Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- People Ex Rel. Conway v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Root v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Snyder v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Long v. McMILLANSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.