Cooper v. Hindley
Washington Supreme Court
Motion filed in the supreme court August 29, 1912, for a supersedeas.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Under the initiative power reserved in the freeholders’ charter, certain electors of the city of Spokane filed a petition with the city clerk, praying and requesting that certain proposed amendments to the city charter be submitted to the people. It is alleged that, notwithstanding the charter imposes a mandatory duty upon the commissioners of the city to call an election within thirty days after filing the petition, for the purpose of submitting the proposed amendments to the whole electorate of the city, the commissioners, the defendants, have wholly neglected, failed, and refused to call…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hindman v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Brown v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- State ex rel. Nooksack River Boom Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Gibson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Burrows v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Hindley v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Austin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- State ex rel. Davis & Co v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Pioneer Mining & Ditch Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.