Legal Opinion

Tighe v. Ginsberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Green, J.

We hold that a patient’s claim against a physician for breach of the fiduciary duty of confidentiality as a result of the physician’s unauthorized disclosure of the patient’s medical records is subject to the three-year Statute of Limitations for negligence (CPLR 214 [5]), rather than the shorter limitations period for medical malpractice (CPLR 214-a).

On August 6, 1984, plaintiff visited Dr. Hoffman for treatment of a hearing problem. Dr. Hoffman, although not a party to this action, is an associate of defendant Dr. Ginsberg and an employee of defendant Buffalo…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
  4. Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Biddle v. Warren General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API