Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1977PublishedCited by 230 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
We hold that, inasmuch as the relationship between Sears, Roebuck as property owner and Enco Associates as architects had its genesis in the contract between them, in an action commenced more than three but less than six years after the completion of the ramp system with respect to which the architects’ services were rendered, the owner may recover contract damages against the architects either on the theory of breach of a particular contract provision or on the theory of failure to exercise due care in the performance of the contract services.
On the present…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Milau Associates, Inc. v. North Avenue Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Webber v. Herkimer & Mohawk Street RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Martin v. Julius Dierck Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Vigilant Insurance of America v. Housing Authority of El PasoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.