Legal Opinion

Biddle v. Warren General Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1999No. 98-952PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAjlice Robie Resnick, J.

Aside from the procedural and evidentiary questions, these appeals present five general issues for our determination. The first issue is whether a physician or hospital can be held liable for the unauthorized, out-of-court disclosure of confidential information obtained in the course of the physician-patient relationship.

This issue is easily resolved. “In Ohio, a physician can be held liable for unauthorized disclosures of medical information. See Hammonds v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (N.D.Ohio 1965), 243 F.Supp. 793 [7 Ohio Misc. 25, 34 O.O.2d 138]; Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jackson (1967), 10…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  4. Alberts v. DevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. MacDonald v. ClingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ward v. Summa Health SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Roe v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio RegionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Tuleta v. Med. Mut. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Hageman v. Southwest General Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2008

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API