Ferguson v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
In this products liability diversity action arising from injuries sustained when a re volver manufactured by defendant fell to the floor and discharged, plaintiff has asserted three causes of action: (1) negligence, (2) breach of warranty, and (3) strict liability. Defendant pleads as a special defense that the action is time-barred, and moves for summary judgment.
The relevant dates for the purposes of this motion are as follows:
February 4, 1965 — production of the subject revolver was completed.
February 9, 1965 — the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. Phoenix Investment Counsel of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Providence & Worcester Railroad v. Sargent & Greenleaf, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. GAF Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Cincinnati, Ohio v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Denwat Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.