Legal Opinion

City of Laporte v. Scott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1906No. 20,507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Laporte Circuit Court; Walter A. Funic, Judge. Suit by Emmett Scott and others against the City of Laporte and another. From an interlocutory decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

—This appeal is prosecuted by appellants to reverse an interlocutory order of the lower court granting a temporary injunction against the city of Laporte and the Laporte Water Supply Company. The order in question is as follows:

■ “And the judge of this court, being duly advised in the premises, orders that the defendants, their officers, agents and servants, and each of them, be and are hereby severally restrained and enjoined—said city of Laporte, from paying money or issuing any of its evidences of indebtedness' to said Laporte Water Supply Company and from paying directly or indirectly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. UhlIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Scott v. City of LaporteIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Spicer v. HoopIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pub. Ser. Com. v. Ind'p'ls RailwaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Tuf-Tread Corp. v. KilbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Public Service Commission v. Indianapolis Railways, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Risch v. BurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Public Service Commission v. New York Central RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API