Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Laporte

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1903No. 19,878PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From Laporte Circuit Court; A. G. Capron, Special Judge. Suit for injunction by Emmet II. Scott and others against the city of Laporte and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

Appellants, as taxpayers of the city of Laporte, commenced this action to enjoin the taking of certain steps by said city looking to the procuring of an additional water supply for its purposes and for the use of its inhabitants. Upon a final hearing an injunction was refused. A motion -for a new trial was filed, assigning as grounds therefor that the decision of said court was not sustained by sufficient evidence and was contrary to law. This motion was overruled, and an • exception duly reserved by appellants, and said ruling is assigned as error.

Answering a preliminary contention of…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. City of Springfield v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Van Eaton v. Town of SidneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Voss v. Waterloo Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API