Legal Opinion

Needham v. Wright

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1895No. 15,419PublishedCited by 44 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— The facts and events leading up to the 'bringing of this action are substantially the same as *192those upon which was founded the case of Rand, Rec., v. Wright, 141 Ind. 226.

As appears from that case, certain persons constituting the Indiana Banking Company, entered into written articles of agreement, forming a copartnership under the name and style of the Indiana Banking Company, for the purpose of carrying on the business of banking in the city of Indianapolis for the period of five years from the first day of March, 1875, with a proviso that the life of the partnership might, at the end of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe Co. v. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Anderson v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Bryan v. SchollIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. ComerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Indiana State Toll Bridge Commission v. MinorIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Moore v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API