Anderson v. Black
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The plaintiffs claimed title to the mining ground in controversy under a location made on the 5th of April, 1881. The defendants claimed under a subsequent overlapping location. The further facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action was instituted for the purpose 'of recovering the possession of specific real property, a mining claim, with damages for the withholding thereof, and for a temporary injunction pending the action.
The verdict of the jury was in favor of the plaintiffs for the recovery of the possession of the property sued for, without damages. It does not .appear from the record whether or not any injunction had been granted.
From the judgment rendered in the cause and an order' refusing a new trial the defendants appeal.
The first point made by them is, that the cause was one which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Taylor v. MiddletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- King v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by5 opinions
- Upton v. LarkinMontana Supreme Court · 1888
- Cargnani v. CargnaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Eaton v. NorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- West Granite Mountain Mining Co. v. Granite Mountain Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1888
- Boot v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918