Taylor v. Middleton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mono County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This is an action of ejectment to recover a mining claim. It seems that the ground was originally located by one Neal, and called the Neal Mine. The plaintiff claims to have subsequently relocated it on the 1st of January, 1881, under the name of the Permelia Mine. The instructions of the court to the jury were erroneous in several particulars.
1. The evidence tended show a location of the ground in question by Neal prior to the attempted location by the plaintiff. Whether or not such location by Neal, if made, was abandoned or forfeited prior to the plaintiff’s attempted location on the 1st…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Estate of MoleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Crane v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Marshall v. Harney Peak Tin Mining, Milling & Manuf'g Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.