Legal Opinion
Boot v. Boyd
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1918No. Civ. No. 1566PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Action in claim and delivery, the defendant being the sheriff of Tehama County.
On the ninth day of January, 1915,/R. A. Boot and Nora Boot, his wife, in consideration of $15,642.50, by deed conveyed to plaintiff 170 acres of land in Tehama County, spoken of as the R. A. Boot ranch. On the same day said R. A. and Nora Boot executed to plaintiff a bill of sale conveying certain personal property, consisting of mules, horses, wagons, farming implements, etc., it being stated therein that the consideration named in the above-mentioned deed was also paid for the personal property transferred by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonald v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Adams v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Mace v. O'ReilleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Sprigg v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacKenzie v. AngleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Westervelt v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1981