Legal Opinion

King v. Meyer

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Sonoma County. This was an action of ejectment to recover a tract of land in Sonoma County.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Sonoma County. This was an action of ejectment to recover a tract of land in Sonoma County. The defendant, in his answer, alleged a parol contract between the parties, by the terms of which the plaintiff was to convey, for a stipulated price in money, the demanded premises to him, also averred a full payment by him of such price, and that he had been let into and then held possession of the demanded premises, in accordance with said contract, and prayed that the plaintiff be adjudged to make complete specific performance of said…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sprague, J.:

Upon the question as to the fact of a verbal contract of sale of the lands in controversy between plaintiff and defendant, the payment of the full consideration agreed upon by defendant to plaintiff, and the entry of defendant into possession of the premises under such verbal contract of sale, there is a substantial conflict of evidence, and under the uniform action of this Court, although the evidence in this • case, as presented by the record, seems to be vague and unsatisfactory, we do not feel at liberty to disturb the ■findings.

Theerror assigned in the admission…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Levitt v. Glen L. Clark & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Anderson v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Boot v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API