Legal Opinion

Himmel v. Eichengreen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 31, 1908PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

There are two appeals in this record from the Baltimore City Court. They present the same questions and will be considered by us in one opinion.

On the 24th of December, 1906, a writ of attachment at the suit of the plaintiffs was issued out of the Baltimore City Court against Jennie Eichengreen, the defendant, a non-resident debtor returnable to the January return day, 1907. The writ was laid also in the hands of the Supreme Conclave Improved Order of Heptasophs, a fraternal beneficiary association, as garnishee, and a certain fund due and owing the defendant, as a beneficiary of the late…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Mineral Point Railroad v. BarronIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Coward v. DillingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Dale v. BrumblyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  5. Barton v. International Fraternal AllianceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Lankford v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. County Commissioners v. Board of County School CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Worcester Co. v. School Comr's.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. FugetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API