Legal Opinion
Mayor of Baltimore v. Fuget
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 20, 1933No. [No. 67, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.
The appeal in this case is from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City in a mandamus proceeding, directing the appellants, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, the board of estimates, the board of supervisors of city charities, and the city comptroller, to comply with certain provisions of the Acts of 1929, ch. 401, as amended by the Acts of 1931, ch. 115, providing for what is therein designated as “Mothers’ Relief”.
To pass upon the question raised on this appeal, it will be necessary for us to give a brief history of the legislation on this subject, starting with the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- State ex rel. Haberlan v. LoveNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Lankford v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Ruggles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Coleman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Campbell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- State's Atty v. City of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Bender v. Arundel Arena, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.