Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. Helms

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 1965No. [No. 366, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, C. J.

The facts with which we deal in this appeal are, for the main part, undisputed. They may be briefly stated and they follow. On September 27, 1953, an accident occurred on Route 301, a public highway in the State of Maryland. One of the vehicles involved was a taxicab owned by Carl H. Campbell, then being operated by one James E. Duckett with Campbell’s permission. This latter fact is mildly disputed, but, for the purposes of this case, we shall assume it to be true. Persons named Helms and Staples were injured in the accident.

At the time of the collision, Campbell’s vehicle was insured by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Cearfoss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. Schmeizl v. SchmeizlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Hunt v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Slate v. ZitomerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API