Worcester Co. v. School Comr's.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the appeal now before us it becomes the duty of this Court to construe and apply for the fifty-eighth time the clause of Section 29, Article 3 of the State Constitution which provides that "every law enacted by the General Assembly shall embrace but one subject and that shall be described in its title." In the present instance this provision is invoked with a view to having declared invalid Section 112 1/2E of the Code of Public General Laws enacted by Chapter 635 of the Acts of 1908. The Act in question is entitled "An Act to repeal and re-enact with amendments Section 67 of Article 77…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Gaines v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
- Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Lankford v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Luman v. Hitchens Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Goldsmith v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Joseph R. Foard Co. v. Maryland ex rel. GoralskiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Board of Education v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Curtis v. MacTierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Mayor of Baltimore v. PerrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.