State v. Hunt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant contends the trial judge erroneously admitted into evidence State’s Exhibits 2 and 3. These exhibits were bottles of Singletary Rat Treatment, a rat poison, bought on 14 May 1974 by Edward Jarman, then Sheriff of Anson County, from the same drugstore where on 31 August 1973 defendant had allegedly bought the same type of rat poison. Defendant argues these exhibits were irrelevant and immaterial.
It is well established that “in a criminal case every circumstance calculated to throw any light on the supposed crime is admissible and permissible. State v. Hamilton, 264…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.