Legal Opinion
Pascoe v. Hoyle Lowdermilk, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 12, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-K-2272PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action against their employer, defendant Hoyle Lowdermilk, Inc., based on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Plaintiffs have also asserted pendent state claims including wrongful discharge, outrageous conduct, and breach of contract. This case is presently before me on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ state law claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
When deciding whether to exercise pendent claim jurisdiction, I must first determine if I have the constitutional power…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Henry Carl DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cripps v. United Biscuit of Great BritainDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Hensman v. Adams County Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- DiRito v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Easton v. Louisville & Jefferson County Board of HealthDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987