Legal Opinion
Naton v. Bank of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1981No. Nos. 78-1059, 78-1562PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This action arises under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (amended 1978). Plaintiff Paul Naton brought this suit against defendant Bank of California, N.A. (the “Bank”) alleging that the Bank terminated his employment in 1975 because of his age.1 The jury returned a special verdict for Naton. The Bank appeals from the judgment for Naton and from the district court’s denial of the Bank’s motions for dismissal of Naton’s claim, for judgment n. o. v., and for a new trial. Naton appeals rulings of the district court regarding damages.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Anne M. DARTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Rios v. Enterprise Ass'n Steamfitters, Local No. 638Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Alvin Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation, Engine Division, and Andre J. Lambert, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.