Legal Opinion
DiRito v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 18, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-K-1026PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action against defendants based oh the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1983). Plaintiff also asserts pendent state claims including outrageous conduct, promissory estoppel, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of the Colorado age discrimination statute, Colo.Rev.Stat. § 8-2-116 (1973). 1
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiff’s § 8-2-116 claim for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 Defendants assert that an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rawson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Hannon v. Continental National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
- Ritter v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Borumka v. Rocky Mountain Hospital & Medical ServiceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Hensman v. Adams County Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987