Legal Opinion

Hensman v. Adams County Department of Social Services

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 12, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-K-1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action against defendants based on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206. Plaintiff also asserts pendent state claims including violations of the Colorado age discrimination statute, Colo. Rev.Stat. § 8-2-116, and breach of contract. Defendants move to dismiss plaintiff’s pendent claims. For the following reasons, I grant defendants’ motions.

I

When deciding whether to exercise pendent jurisdiction, I must determine if I have the constitutional power to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hannon v. Continental National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
  5. Ritter v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. LaSorella v. Penrose St. Francis Healthcare SystemDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  3. Pettis v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 1995
  4. Tipton v. Aspen Airways, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  5. Mathis v. Allied Wholesale Distributors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API