Legal Opinion

LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2008No. Nos. 2007-1199, 2007-1372, and 2007-1373PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} In this discretionary and certified-conflict appeal, the issue is whether the saving statute of R.C. 2305.19(A) applies to an action that was not commenced pursuant to the specific requirements of Civ.R. 15(D). We conclude that when the specific requirements of Civ.R. 15(D) for commencing an action are not met, an amendment does not relate back to the date of the original complaint under Civ.R. 15(C) and Civ.R. 3(A) and the saving statute of R.C. 2305.19(A) does not apply. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the appellate court.

I

A

{¶ 2} In 2002, John A. LaNeve was injured in the course…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Iacono v. Anderson Concrete Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gliozzo v. University Urologists of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Erwin v. BryanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Ludwigsen v. Lakeside Plaza, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Swopes v. McCormickOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Moore v. Mt. Carmel Health Sys. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API