Erwin v. Bryan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} Civ.R. 15(D) provides that when a plaintiff does not know the name of a defendant, the defendant may be designated in a complaint by any name and description. It also provides, however, that a plaintiff must aver in the complaint that the name of the defendant could not be discovered, that the summons issued must contain the words “name unknown,” and that a copy of the summons must be personally served on the defendant.
{¶ 2} Civ.R. 15(D) cannot be used to prosecute this action against William V. Swoger, D.O., and his professional corporation, Union Internal Medicine Specialties, Inc.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Fletcher v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Cundall v. U.S. BankOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Proctor v. KardassilarisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Rashoun Smith v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- State v. Boaston (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Ludwigsen v. Lakeside Plaza, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. WolffOhio Supreme Court · 2012
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.