Legal Opinion
Gliozzo v. University Urologists of Cleveland, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 2007No. 2006-1166PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} On November 14, 2003, appellee, Frank Gliozzo, filed a medical-malpractice action against appellants, University Urologists of Cleveland, Inc. and Martin Resnick, M.D., alleging negligence in their performance of a surgical procedure on him in June 2002. Before filing his complaint, Gliozzo had hand-delivered a 180-day letter to appellants, which extended the statute of limitations for his claim. See R.C. 2305.113(B)(1).
{¶ 2} Gliozzo’s deadline was November 14, 2004, one year from the date that he filed his complaint, to perfect service. Civ.R. 3(A). Service was attempted by certified…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bell v. Midwestern Educational Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- First Bank of Marietta v. ClineOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Brinkman v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by58 opinions
- LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. LundeenOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Moore v. Mt. Carmel Health Sys. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Brady v. Bucyrus Police DepartmentOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Chrysler Fin. Servs. v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.