Legal Opinion

Maryhew v. Yova

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1984No. 83-207PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holmes, J.,

It is rudimentary that in order to render a valid personal judgment, a court must have personal jurisdiction over the defendant. This may be acquired either by service of process upon the defendant, the voluntary appearance and submission of the defendant or his legal representative, or by certain acts of the defendant or his legal representative which constitute an involuntary submission to the jurisdiction of the court. The latter may more accurately be referred to as a waiver of certain affirmative defenses, including jurisdiction over the person under the Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Lynn v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Lash v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Spearman v. Sterling Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Emerson v. National Cylinder Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gliozzo v. University Urologists of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. EmgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bell v. Midwestern Educational Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API