State v. Sanders
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
Defendant brings forward twenty-two assignments of error. The assignments of error not herein discussed either do not warrant consideration or are unlikely to recur at the next trial.
Defendant asserts in his third assignment of error that the trial judge erred in denying defendant the right to state specific grounds for his objections. We agree.
The trial judge instructed defense counsel not to give specific grounds for her objections unless he asked for them. As a result, counsel had no choice but to rely on general objections throughout the trial. It is well settled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SpicerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.