Legal Opinion

State v. . Cureton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1940PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNHILL, J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to dismiss, on his motion of nonsuit, the first degree murder charge. The record does not sustain this assignment. Only a general motion of nonsuit was entered. However, as this is a capital case we have considered defendant’s assignment as if supported by the record.

Briefly stated, the evidence favorable to the State tends to show that on 23 June, 1940, the defendant, the deceased and others, had been engaged in a game of skin. The deceased took a card out of the deck which, as we understand, is a serious breach of the ethics of that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. State v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. S. v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. State v. EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. S. v. . SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. PropstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API