Legal Opinion

State v. Spicer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1980No. 120PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant’s first argument is that he was denied due process of law when the trial judge refused to grant him an evidentiary hearing upon his motion to dismiss all of the charges. He also maintains that the right to such an evidentiary hearing is inherent in G.S. 15A-954. Defendant’s contentions are without merit. In order to discuss defendant’s due process and statutory claims, it is necessary to examine the underlying claim upon which defendant sought an evidentiary hearing.

Defendant stated that the district attorney’s office in the Fifth District has established a policy…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Pueblo v. Dávila DelgadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
  3. State v. CorbettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API