Legal Opinion

Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of Fox

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 2006No. 26193PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Acting Justice ANDERSON:

Russ and Lee Pye, along with their partnership, Justin Enterprises (the Pyes), initiated this action against the Estate of Dorothy T. Fox, the Estate of John C. Fox, John Richard Fox, III (the Foxes), and attorney G. Thomas Hill, alleging (1) abuse of process, (2) civil conspiracy, and (3) a violation of the South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act, S.C.Code Ann. section 15-36-10. The circuit court dismissed Hill from the action at the summary judgment stage, and directed a verdict in favor of the Foxes at the close of the Pyes’ case. We affirm.

FACTUAL/P…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Hackworth v. Greywood at Hammett, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. City of Hartsville v. South Carolina Municipal Insurance & Risk Financing FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API