Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Township of Island Lake

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1929No. Nos. 27,133, 27,381PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment decreeing that plaintiff take nothing for its cause of action and that defendant recover its costs and disbursements.

One Danks contracted with the defendant to construct a township road. Plaintiff was surety on his bond. Danks defaulted and abandoned the work. Plaintiff then entered into a written contract with defendant to complete the Danks contract by performing the ■work remaining undone, the same unit prices as were specified in the Danks contract to be paid therefor. Plaintiff completed the work, having received payment of $3,000 thereon. The question…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Haley v. Byers Transportation CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Association of Western Railways v. Riss & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Miles v. F.E.R.M. Enterprices, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Ambrozi v. FryNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Stevens v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API