Legal Opinion
Meixner v. Buecksler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 10, 1944No. 33,668PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
This action was brought to recover treble damages for trespass, pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, § 561.04 (Mason St. 1927, § 9585), for cutting down and removing certain trees growing upon plaintiff’s property.
At all times material to this action, plaintiff owned the S % of the NW 14 and the NW % of the SW % of section 22, township 107 north, range 20 west, in Steele county. The defendant Bots-ford Lumber Company, hereinafter called the “company,” owned an adjoining tract described as the S % of the SW % and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Freese v. TrippIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Harndon v. StultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Carpenter v. HymanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lawrenz v. Langford Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Erickson v. PomerankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Holmberg v. BerginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Loftsgaarden v. ReilingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Bucko v. First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.