Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sylte v. Power

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 21, 1897No. Nos. 10,728—(17)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application by the state, on the relation of Ingeborg J. Sylte, for writ of mandamus to Gorham Powers, as judge of the Twelfth judicial district, to settle and allow a proposed case.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

An alternative writ of mandamus was issued herein to the respondent, as judge of the Twelfth judicial district, requiring him to settle and allow a proposed case and exceptions in an action wherein A. Anderson was plaintiff and the relator herein was defendant, or show cause to the contrary. The respondent made return to the writ, setting forth certain facts as a reason why he ought not now to settle and allow such case. The relator, by her reply, substantially admits the truth of the return.

It appears from such return and the admitted facts in the petition that on February 18, 1897, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Brunt & Wilkins Manufacturing Co. v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Truhn v. BaxterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Johnson v. GrothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Felton v. StolbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Hemza v. FishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API