Legal Opinion

Hammersten v. Reiling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1962No. 38,211PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action for libel. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the total amount of $20,000, of which $12,500 was designated as general damages and $7,500 as punitive damages. This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. He contends that (1) the article published by him was qualifiedly privileged and that the requisite evidence to establish malice in its publication was lacking; and (2) the verdict was so excessive as to indicate passion and prejudice on the part of the jury.

I…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Matthis v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Friedell v. Blakely Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Hurley v. Northwest Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
  5. Rose v. KochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API