Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge:
¶ 1 We address whether A.R.S. § 12-341.01 requires an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party if the contract that authorizes such fees mandates an award to the other party but is silent as to the prevailing party. As a matter of statutory interpretation, we conclude that § 12-341.01(A) permits a fees award in this situation but does not mandate it.
¶ 2 Holly McGovern and Donald Sines (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal the trial court's denial of their request for attorney fees and costs against Tucson Estates Property Owners Association (TEPOA) after its request…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Peterson v. SurpriseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Chula Vista Homeowners Ass'n v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.