Granville v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOWNIE, Judge.
¶ 1 Vince Leroy Howard appeals from a judgment awarding John Granville $72,000 in attorneys’ fees under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 77(f) (judgment after trial de novo from arbitration appeal). Granville cross-appeals, arguing the superior court erred by not awarding him the full amount of fees he requested. In this opinion, we set forth several non-exclusive factors that trial courts should consider when awarding fees under Rule 77(f). We vacate the fee award entered in this matter and remand for reconsideration based on the factors stated herein.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- In Re Guardianship of SleethCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fisher v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Petrovich v. BranciforteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017