Legal Opinion

Duff v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 29, 2019No. 2 CA-SA 2018-0058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARING, Presiding Judge:

¶1 By special action, petitioner Claudia Duff, a plaintiff in a personal-injury action valued at less than $50,000, challenges the respondent judge's interlocutory order overruling her "Objection to FASTAR Pilot Program" and denying her "Motion for Arbitration Pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-133." She maintains the Fast Trial and Alternative Resolution Program ("FASTAR") does not apply to her case because at the time she filed her complaint, a published Pima County local rule required § 12-133 arbitration for all civil cases in which "the amount in controversy does not exceed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SeidelArizona Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claudia Duff v. Hon. lee/tucson PoliceArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Abel v. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. People v. William Robert EasonColorado Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State of Iowa v. Tyjaun Levell TuckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
  5. State of Iowa v. Tyjaun Levell TuckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API